Which translation should I settle on?

Honestly, I don't think a clean answer to this exists. Tracing how the early church handled it locates the modern debate quite usefully. Note that interpretation has already entered at the translation stage here.

短く答えるなら「両方正しい」となります。長く答えると一冊の本になります。教派によって答えが大きく違う問いなので、ご自身の教会でも聞いてみてください。

Note that interpretation has already entered at the translation stage here. There's a long history here, with the argument running from the fourth century onward.

I heard a sermon on precisely this and I'll summarize how it was framed. This may be a minority reading, but here is how I take it. There's a long history here, with the argument running from the fourth century onward.

I'd start with your own reading before reaching for anyone's doctrinal summary. Worth adding: a non-canonical text treats the same theme and the comparison is illuminating.

私の教会では次のように説明していますが、これが唯一の説明ではありません。

I'd start with your own reading before reaching for anyone's doctrinal summary.