外典を読むことは問題ないのでしょうか
エノク書やトマス福音書を読んでいると、教会の人に良い顔をされません。読むこと自体に問題があるのでしょうか。
エノク書やトマス福音書を読んでいると、教会の人に良い顔をされません。読むこと自体に問題があるのでしょうか。
もし急いでいないなら、一年ほど寝かせてから読み直すことをすすめます。経験から言うと、頭で理解する前に生活のほうが先に変わることがあります。
I'd start with your own reading before reaching for anyone's doctrinal summary.
Commentaries genuinely diverge here, so read two or three rather than one.
I'd start with your own reading before reaching for anyone's doctrinal summary. It's fine to carry the question unresolved for a while. I walked the same road. These days I care more about the question than the answer.
原語を確認すると、日本語訳よりも意味の幅が広いことが分かります。初期の教会がどう扱ったかを追うと、現代の議論の位置が見えてきます。
この回答は削除されました
Knowing the situation of the community it was written for makes this much clearer. Sometimes changing translation dissolves the question entirely. I'm a minister and my honest answer to this is that I don't know.
Commentaries genuinely diverge here, so read two or three rather than one. I'd start with your own reading before reaching for anyone's doctrinal summary. The answer differs depending on whether you're asking historically or confessionally.
正直に言えば、この問いに明快な答えを出すのは難しいと思っています。同じ疑問を持つ人は多く、私も長いあいだ答えを持てませんでした。実践としては、小さいところから始めるのが現実的だと思います。
Most scholars today read this figuratively, though a literal reading has serious defenders.
Briefly: both are right. At length: it's a book. I'll list some sources below in case you want to go further. Worth adding: a non-canonical text treats the same theme and the comparison is illuminating.
It's fine to carry the question unresolved for a while.